Two interesting news broadcasts were reported back to back. One, an atrocity done in the name of peace - another, done with intentions of terror and mayhem.
In the first story, NATO claims that one of its airstrikes in Libya has taken the lives of innocent civilians. In the not-war against Qadaffi, a NATO weapons system failure led to an errant airstrike that took the lives of nine civilians. Two of the civilians were children. Obviously, NATO says that it 'regrets the loss of innocent civilian lives'.
The second story was half way around the world, in Afghanistan.
The Taliban has claimed responsibility for a car bomb that killed 3 innocent civilians near the edge of Kunduz City. Eleven other civilians were wounded in the car bomb that was targeting a German military convoy. Afghan President Hamid Karzai is still involved in peace talks with the Taliban, in attempts to quell the persistently unnecessary bloodshed.
The irony is that both stories have led to innocent people losing their lives. One, NATO, is trying to help. The other, the Taliban (which I feel have NO place in 'peace talks'), is intentionally trying to disrupt every facet of capitalist culture by killing their own people. Different ideologies. Same result. Be it government intervention or radical, jihadist thoughts, innocent people are dying. How do you fight broken ideologies?
Showing posts with label middle east. Show all posts
Showing posts with label middle east. Show all posts
Sunday, June 19, 2011
NATO and Taliban
Friday, May 20, 2011
Alwaleed on Israel
Fox News Correspondant Neil Cavuto today held an interview with Saudi Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal. He is a member of the Saudi royal family, and the nephew of Saudi King Abdullah. His wealth has earned him the alias as the 'Arabian Warren Buffet'.
Lately, the media claims that President Obama has 'thrown Israel under the bus', with his speech yesterday. In it, he claims that Israel's best chance for peace is to go back to the borders they had in 1967, which are significantly smaller. Not surprisingly, the Israeli Prime minister refuses to honor Obama's Mideast agenda.
Alwaleed, however, praised Obama's decision, calling it 'prudent' and claiming that Israel must abide by the President's road map. He claims that much of the middle East conflict does not stem from the Israeli conflict, and that it is in fact the Egyptian people who threw Mubarak under the bus.
Many people feel like America has turned its back on one of its most important allies, and have unleveled the playing field. Some of the same people who claim they want peace are the very same who denounce Israel and desire it's eradication.
Lately, the media claims that President Obama has 'thrown Israel under the bus', with his speech yesterday. In it, he claims that Israel's best chance for peace is to go back to the borders they had in 1967, which are significantly smaller. Not surprisingly, the Israeli Prime minister refuses to honor Obama's Mideast agenda.
Alwaleed, however, praised Obama's decision, calling it 'prudent' and claiming that Israel must abide by the President's road map. He claims that much of the middle East conflict does not stem from the Israeli conflict, and that it is in fact the Egyptian people who threw Mubarak under the bus.
Many people feel like America has turned its back on one of its most important allies, and have unleveled the playing field. Some of the same people who claim they want peace are the very same who denounce Israel and desire it's eradication.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




